OPERASI dalam REJIMEN ASKAR MELAYU DIRAJA

Berikut adalah nama nama operasi yang dilakukan oleh Angkatan Tentera Malaysia secara rata,namun ada beberapa operasi yang terpaksa di rahsiakan kerana menyentuh kepada ketegangan....

Tentera Darat
Rejimen Askar Melayu Diraja
a) 1 melayu-OPERASI Kawasan Gerik, Perak-Operasi tersebut bermula pada 1947 hingga 1950 yang diketuai Oleh Lt Col G.R Garreet dan Lt Col G. T Denaro telah berjaya membunuh seramai 38 orang PGK dan menawan 12 PGK. Seorang anggota pasukan telah terkorban ialah Pbt Sulong bin Abdullah pada 9 Ogos 1949.

  -Operasi Kawasan Mentakab, Pahang-Operasi tersebut bermula pada Jan 50 hingga Feb 1952 yang diketuai oleh Lt Col S. Whitting telah berjaya menbunuh 15 orang PGK dan menawan 13 orang PGK manakala anggota pasukan yang terkorban seramai 4 orang.

-Operasi Kawasan Negeri Sembilan-Operasi tersebut bermula Jan 1951 hingga Feb 1951 yang diketuai oleh Lt Col S. Whitting telah berjaya membunuh seramai 28 orang dan menawan 15 PGK manakala anggota pasukan yang telah terkorban seramai 12 orang.

-Operasi Kawasan Pahang-Operasi tersebut bermula Dis 1951 hingga Feb 1952 juga diketuai oleh Lt Col S. Whitting di mana pasukan telah berjaya membunuh 6 dan menawan seoarang PGK. Tiada berlaku kehilangan jiwa di pihak pasukan.

-Operasi Kawasan Kluang, Johor-Operasi tersebut bermula Mac 1952 hingga Mac 1953 yang diketuai oleh Lt Col S. J. Linden Kelly di mana pasukan telah berjaya membunuh 10 PGK manakala 2 orang anggota pasukan telah terkorban.

-Operasi Kawasan Batu Gajah, Perak-Operasi tersebut bermula pada Apr 1953 sehingga Mac 1953 yang diketuai oleh Lt Col S.J Linden Kelly dan Lt Col D.G Jebb di mana pasukan telah berjaya membunuh 12 PGK dan menawan 2 PGK manakala anggota pasukan yang terkorban seramai 4 orang.

-Operasi Kawasan Kepala Batas, Kedah-Operasi bermula Mei 1955 sehingga Dis 1960 yang diketuai oleh Lt Kol D.G Jebb dan Lt Col C. A. Morris di mana pasukan telah berjaya membunuh 14 PGK dan menawan 6 PGK manakala seorang anggota pasukan terkorban.

-Operasi Jalan Raja, Lada Pedas Dan Pukat-Operasi ini dijalankan di kawasan Nonok, Bukit Lan dan Entabai, Sarawak mulai Jan 1970 hingga Sep 1970 yang diketuai oleh Lt Kol Abdul Hamid bin Ibrahim di mana pasukan telah berjaya membunuh seramai 23 anggota Pasukan Gerila Rakyat Sarawak dan 11 orang berjaya ditahan.

-Operasi Indra IV -Operasi ini dijalankan di kawasan Karak, Pahang pada 30 Nov 1974 sehingga 20 Dis 1974 yang diketuai oleh Lt Kol Syed Alwee Al Airos. Pasukan telah berjaya membunuh seorang pengganas bernama CT Ah Tok

-Operasi Indra V-Operasi ini dijalankan di kawasan Raub, Pahang pada Ogos 1977 sehingga Nov 1977 yang diketuai oleh Lt Kol Abdul Malik bin Hj Ismail. .5 PGK mati.

3 melayu-PERISTIWA SUNGAI SEMUR-Pertempuran ini berlaku di Sungai Semur, Hulu Kelantan di kawasan Gua Musang pada 23 Mac 1950. Peristiwa ini menyaksikan Platun 12 Kompeni D yang diketuai Lt M Hassan bin Yasin berkekuatan 26 anggota telah diserang hendap oleh pengganas komunis berkekuatan 250 orang. Di dalam pertempuran ini, 17 anggota terkorban semasa pertempuran termasuk Lt Hassan. Lapan lagi anggota yang mengalami kecederaan telah meninggal dunia kemudian. Hanya tiga anggota sahaja yang tidak mengalami sebarang kecederaan. Manakala di pihak pengganas komunis pula dianggarkan 30 orang telah mati.
-GERAKAN DI PAHANG-Pada tahun 1952, pasukan diaturgerak ke negeri Pahang bagi melaksanakan tugas gerakan selama setahun. Markas Batalion ditempatkan di Gali, manakala Markas Taktikal di Raub. Dalam masa setahun di Pahang, pasukan telah memperoleh banyak kejayaan, iaitu telah membunuh seramai 14 orang pengganas komunis dan merampas banyak kelengkapan, dokumen serta makanan musuh.
-GERAKAN DI KELANTAN- Jan 1955, pelbagai peristiwa telah berlaku. Antaranya, Pbt Yaakob yang terkorban ditembak pengganas pada 27 Jul 1953 serta kejayaan Kompeni B membunuh tiga pengganas komunis semasa serang hendap dalam tahun yang sama. Pada 5 Mac 1954, Kompeni B yang diketuai oleh Mej Brown telah membunuh tiga lagi pengganas komunis semasa serang hendap di Pasir Kelang, Kuala Krai, Seterusnya, pada 15 Okt 1954, kompeni campuran yang diketuai oleh Mej Brown telah berjaya membunuh lima orang pengganas komunis yang dipercayai terlibat di dalam pertempuran di Sungai Semur.
Bulan Januari 1955 di mana satu serang hendap yang diketuai oleh Mej Brown telah berjaya membunuh tiga pengganas komunis. Namun demikian, pasukan telah kehilangan seorang anggota iaitu 4024 Sjn Khalil bin Burok.
-GERAKAN DI PERAK- Sepanjang bertugas di Perak, pasukan telah membuat tugas gerakan di kawasan Parit, Bota dan Tanjung Tualang. Diantara kejayaan pasukan semasa di Perak adalah pada bulan Nov 1955, pasukan berjaya menawan seorang pengganas. Pada 4 Dis 1955, pasukan berjaya menawan sebuah khemah musuh berserta alat percetakan. Pada 23 Dis 1955, pasukan berjaya membunuh tiga orang pengganas semasa serang hendap. Pada 21 Feb 1957, Platun 8 telah berjaya membunuh empat pengganas komunis di Tronoh. mengutus ucapan tahniah Semasa pasukan melaksanakan “Gerakan Bintang” pada awal tahun 1958, pasukan telah berjaya membunuh Tien Kei,
Gerakan Bintang menyaksikan pasukan berjaya membunuh seramai 60 pengganas komunis. 1961.
-GERAKAN DI SABAH dan PERISTIWA KALABAKAN -Peristiwa ini menyaksikan seorang pegawai dan tujuh anggota terkorban manakala 16 yang lain Rentetan dari pertempuran ini, sehingga 12 Jan 1964, seramai 22 orang musuh dibunuh dan ramai ditawan. Pada 27 Jan 1964, Platun 5 yang diketuai Lt M Ishar telah bertempur dengan musuh. Seorang tentera Indonesia terbunuh, manakala dua pucuk senapang, 12 grened dan banyak peluru dirampas. Pada 28 Jan 1964 pula, Platun 6 yang diketuai Lt M Abdul Aziz telah membuat serang hendap di Estet Merutai dan berjaya membunuh tiga orang musuh. Seorang lagi musuh telah dibunuh semasa serang hendap pada 19 Apr 1964.
-GERAKAN DI SARAWAK- Simanggang ( Mei 66 – Jun 67 dan Jan 68 – Jul 69). Semasa bertugas di Simanggang, pasukan telah berjaya membunuh seramai tujuh pengganas komunis , Ogos 1974 hingga Jun 1975. Semasa Gerakan Chincang di Sarawak, pada 22 Okt 1974 jam antara 0500 sehingga 0600, . mereka telah berjaya membunuh seramai 5 orang musuh.
-GERAKAN DI KEDAH-jul 1969, gerakan Op Gubir dan Op Kota Bravo yang bertanggung jawab menjaga perbatasan Malaysia/Thailand. Di dalam gerakan ini, pasukan berjaya membunuh enam PGK dan mencederakan yang lain. . Pada 8 Sep 1973, ketika Gerakan Sedar di kawasan Kulim, satu seksyen batalion ini bertempur dengan kira kira 15 anggota komunis yang membawa kepada kematian ketua platun serta seorang komunis. Semasa Gerakan Chincang di Sarawak, pada 22 Okt 1974 jam antara 0500 sehingga 0600, platun yang diketuai oleh Lt M Abdullah bin Dolmat telah bertempur dengan musuh. Dalam pertempuran tersebut, mereka telah berjaya membunuh seramai 5 orang musuh. Satu lagi peristiwa adalah semasa melaksanakan tugas Gerakan Gubir di kawasan Sik dan Baling, pesawat Nuri yang dinaiki anggota telah ditembak jatuh oleh komunis pada 26 Apr 1976. 2 anggotaterkorban
6 melayu- Semasa insurgensi- Pada Sep 1953, 2 PGK dibunuh dalam Operasi HAWK 3 di Raub, Pahang. Pada Dis 1956, 2 anggota berjaya menggagalkan cubaan merampas kenderaan yang telah diserang hendap di Jalan Bentong- Mancis. Kejadian tersebut juga telah mengorbankan 8 orang anggota batalion ini.Pada Jun 1973, Kapt Sani bin Hassan (410094) KPK, Lt M Abd Wahid bin Said (410775) KPK dan Kpl Mohamad bin Muda KPK telah berjaya membunuh 2 orang PGK semasa Ops SETIA di Sungai Siput, Perak ketika membuat serangan ke atas khemah musuh. Pada Jun 1980, Kpl Wan Zain bin Wan Yahya HTS. Sek yang di ketuai oleh beliau telah berjaya membunuh seorang PGK semasa Ops SETIA Ringlet di Cameron Highland. Pada Jun 1984, Sjn Zainuddin bin Ngah KPK. Pl yang di ketuai oleh beliau telah berjaya membunuh 2 PGK semasa Ops KOTA FOXTROT, Belum, Grik, Perak.
-Semasa konfrantasi-Pada Jul 1957, berjaya membunuh dan menawan seorang PGK semasa operasi di daerah Kuala Selangor. Pada Jun 1965, berjaya membunuh 4 penyusup Tentera Indonesia di Kg Pradin, Pontian, Johor semasa konfrontasi.Pada Jun 1965, berjaya menawan 9 orang penyusup Tentera Indonesia di Labis, Johor . Pada Jun 1965, Mohd Yunus , berjaya membunuh 7 orang Tentera Indonesia

7 melayu- insurgensi komunis- 14 Jan 1954, seramai 3 PGK telah dibunuh. 14 Mei 1957, seramai 18 PGK telah dibunuh di lokasi Jelebu, Negeri Sembilan. Kemudian pada 03 Jul 1957, seramai 3 PGK telah dibunuh dan seorang ditangkap . Diikuti pada 14 Mei 1961, Kompeni A dengan bantuan Lincoln Bomber No 1 Sqn RAAF telah mengebom musuh di KM 5 Jelebu dan telah membunuh 18 PGK. Manakala pada Sep 1966, dua orang TNKU telah dapat ditawan di kawasan Merotai,tawau

8melayu- Sarawak dan Pahang Barat (Bentong) 1963 berjaya membunuh 35 orang pengganas komunis dan 22 orang berjaya ditawan. manakala 9 orang anggota pasukan telah gugur dan 21 orang mengalami kecederaan. Operasi MUSI JUGAN pada 1 Nov 1970, Platun Tiger . bertempur di Tanjung Durian, Bau, Sarawak .dalam pertmpuran itu seorang anggota maut manakala seorang cedera .pihak musuh seorang maut.8Jun 1982,2 anggota komunis dibunuh dalam pertempuran di ladang kemasul mengkarak pahang . Operasi INDERA di Pahang Barat. - 3 anggota pasukan ini dianugerahkan PISAU KOMANDO.25 mac 1986,seorang komunis mati di Bentong.-
Op MUSI JUGAN-seorang anggota terkorban, 1 Gudak, Op HENTAM-5 anggota terkorban, Op KOTA-seorang anggota terkorban manakala 2 tutut terkorban dalam OP INDERA9 melayu- Operasi Kelong II iaitu pada 11 Ogos 69 di mana pasukan telah berjaya membunuh 4 orang anggota komunis (PGK) Pada 17 Januari 72 pula dalam Operasi SERGAP bawah naungan 6 a membunuh seorang anggota komunis dan mencederakan seorang komunis Operasi KERIS XI pada 23 Mac 79 bertempat di Matang Sempadi, Sarawak, di mana 3 orang anggota komunis telah berjaya dibunuh dan seorang telah mengalami kecederaan. Operasi RASKAL III iaitu pada 10 Sep 78, seorang lagi anggota komunis telah berjaya dihapuskan dan seorang lagi telah tercedera.
11 melayu-OpKOTA,pada 25 mei 1970,3 orang komunis dibunuh.OPS FIASCO pada 30 mei 1971 di lundu sarawak,2 komunis sarawak dibunuh,16 jun1971 2 agen komunis sarawak ditangkap.1julai 1971 ops fiasco II,bertempat di lundu, 7 agen komunis sarawak ditahan.OPS AWAS kumpulan perompak indonesia di kandai pada 16 mei 2002 dilakukan,hasilnya kumpulan perompak lumpuh sama sekali
15 melayu- Operasi KOTA DELTA di kawasan Klian Intan, Perak iaitu pada 27 Ogos 71, anggota pasukan telah berjaya membunuh 3 orang pengganas komunis - Operasi SELAMAT SAWADI di kawasan Betong, Selatan Thailand pada 18 Dis 79, anggota pasukan telah berjaya membunuh seorang pengganas komunis wanita.
17 melayu- ops RASCOM pada Apr 1973.7 anggota komunis dibunuh,pada 10 april 1975,4 anggota batalion ini cedera diserang oleh komunis yang berkekuatan lebih 30 orang dalam ops GUBIR,dan OPS GUBIR 2 dilakukan dimana 6 anggota komunis dibunuh namun seorang anggota batalion ini maut.-Op Kota Delta  dan Op Kelong IV, pasukan telah berjaya membunuh 2 orang lagi PGK. April 1978 berjaya membunuh 7 orang anggota PGK di Sarawak  dan 10 orang di Semenanjung Malaysia.
20 melayu- OP INDERA XII i Bentong, Pahang telah berjaya menembak mati 2 orang Pengganas Komunis (PGK) di kawasan Bukit Tengah pada 6 Mei 1979. .Pada 27 September 1980 semasa OP INDERA II di Raub,  berjaya membunuh seorang komunis .
21 melayu-Operasi BELASAH Siri 5/93 di Pulau Tambisan, Sabah, 2 orang lanun terbunuh dan 3 orang lanun lagi tercedera dan ditangkap.
24 melayu - OP INDERA XII pada 25 Jun 1979,3 komunis berjaya dibunuh. Jun 1979,seorang komunis dibunuh

Tak lupa juga disini aku senaraikan antara opersi operasi yang dibuat oleh kalangan askar melayu yang tak dapat diberikan maklumat atas beberapa faktor,bahkan beberapa operasi berisiko tinggi juga dihapuskan data datanya.Antara operasi yang wujud tapi dirahsiakan ialah.

Congo (United Nation Peacekeeping Force In Belgian Congo) pada 13 Sep 1960-13 Jul 1961.-  Hartal di Pulau Pinang,- Maulud Nabi di Singapura -13 Mei 1969 di Kuala Lumpur.-  Op Kota Delta -Operasi JALA RAJA - op PENGHANCURAN, BURU, HENTAM  -op GAWAI -misi Khas Bantuan Pemulihan Ketenteraman Awam Khas Timor Leste. -Ops KOTA DELTA,- Ops SCHEARHEAD,- Ops KOTA ALPHA,- Ops GERAP-, Ops YAKIN V-, Ops KOTA ECHO-, Ops RASKAL,- Ops INDRA 1, II dan III - Ops SERGAP-Ops BANDING- Ops INDRA XII- Ops HENTAM GALAS- Ops LUKAH RAJA- Ops INDERA-Ops CAMPUR-, Ops KOTA GOLF-Ops KOTA GRIK- Ops PAKSI SARE- Ops PANGKALAN HULU- Ops SERAMPANG/JAGAKAWAN-Ops PIPI SIRI 3/95-Ops PANCUNG ALPHA-misi  UNTAC - OP Pasir Sektor Selatan - MALBATT-UNPROFOR di Bosnia Herzegovina - MALCON-UNIFIL 1 dan 2-Operasi KOTA GOLF/HOTEL-Operasi BANJIR-Operasi RADAK- Operasi IBLIS, Operasi KOTA ALPHA- Operasi HORNBILL, Operasi PAYONG-, Operasi KOTA DELTA-Operasi SETIA VIII- Operasi KOTA FOXTROT-, Operasi KOTA GOLF-Operasi INDERA XI KHAS- Operasi NGAYAU-Operasi GANZALES IV-Operasi HENTAM GALAS KHAS-Operasi INDERA XII-Operasi LUKAH RAJA- Operasi KOTA ECHO V/806 BRAVO- Operasi TUAH- Operasi INDERA- Operasi INDERA SANG LEE- Operasi IDAMAN KHAS- Operasi IDAMAN 2/88- Operasi BELIONG III TAHAP II- Operasi SERAMPANG 12/88-, Operasi KOTA CHARLIE DELTA 3/96- Operasi MERPATI 3/97-Operasi KRIS PARANG GABUNGAN 1/98-misi UNTAG -misi INTEFET.-  Op Doayai Musnah-Op Indera- Op Para Bala I- Op Hentam Tuan Besar I dan Ii- --Op Selamat Sawade 791/792, --Op Sedar-Op Campur,- -Foxtrot 3/07-Op Kota Charlie/Delta 5/85- Op Paksi Tuan 1/87- Op Setia 5/87- Op Idaman 1/88- Op Serampang 9/88- 1/89- 4/89- 2/90-, Op Serampang/Jangkawan 7/89-Op Kota Charlie/Delta 4/91- 3/93,3/94,6/94- Op Kota Bravo 1/92-Op Merpati/Pipi, Op Kota Bravo/Charlie/Delta 2/98,2/01,5/03-Op Pasir 4/2001-Op Pagar Ii Siri 6/02- Op Pasir Utara 2/04 - Op Merpati Idan Ii-Operasi Bongsu-Operasi GANAS- Operasi SETIA VIII-Operasi KOTA CHARLIE-Operasi KANCIL, -, Operasi 797-Operasi GERAK SEDAR, -Operasi SEDAR-Operasi GUBIR/LENGGONG, Operasi SEDAR 4/85- Operasi SETIA-Operasi KOTA CHARLIE/DELTA, Operasi TAK SIN 8601-Operasi KOTA CHARLIE/DELTA 4/86 -Operasi KOTA ECHO 2/84-Operasi KOTA BRAVO PAGAR-Operasi MERPATI 1/2001 -Operasi UNOSOM II -misi menyelamatkan Hakim Markas UNOSOM dan wartawan -OP PAKSI TUAH 1/88 -

-OP BAMBOO - Operasi 8903 Bravo -Operasi Khas Sedar Lenggong 5/82 -Operasi Sandakan -Operasi Jala Aman-Operasi Ulu Perak-Operasi Kota Echo Sg Kenabong- Operasi Kota Echo Pegkalan Hulu 6/88-Operasi Paksi Setia-Op Keris 14-Op Khas Keris, Op Parang/Gabungan-Op Keris Parang/Gabungan-Op Ngayau Kenyalang- Op Ukur-Op Kemudi Ii- Op Keris Kartika Iv- Op Khas Kong Hee-Op Jalan Aman I/Ii-Op Jala Aman Iii/Iv- Op Indera 5/84- Op Kota Bravo 3/92-Op Kota Charlie/Delta 6/93- Op Asli 2/94- Op Balasah 1/95-Op Balasah 2/96-Op Balasah 4/96- Op Bayu-Op Balasah 1/97-Op Merpati-Op Balasah 3/97, Op Merpati 3/97- Op Balasah 2/98-Op-merpati 2/98- Op Balasah 5/98- Op Balasah 1/99-Op Balasah 4/99-Op Balasah 6/99, Op Pasir-Op Balasah 3/2000- Op Pasir 3/2000-Op Kongkoi 1/2001-Op Merpati 3/2001-Op Merpati 1/2002-Op Kongkoi 3/2002-Op Kongkoi 1/2003-Op Merpati 2/2003-Op Kongkoi 4/2003- Op Kongkoi 2/2004-Op Merpati I dan Ii 6/2004-Op Merpati I Dan Ii 5/2005 - Op Pasir Bersama Sektor (Utara) 1/2007

Selepas ini aku buat rekod untuk rejimen renjer diraja...

-

Apabila ATM dicabar oleh indonesia....

 Pada artikel kali ini,tak perlulah aku nak berkias kias lagi.Sebenarnya dalam hal hubungan 2 hala antara kita dan indonesia hanya harap pada hubungan kesefahaman angkatn tentera kedua dua negara,jika salah satu nya terikut “emo” maka sejarah konfrantasi tak dapat di elakkan.
Sebenarnya,didalam TNI sendiri ada yang sudahpun “emo” dan mereka segaja membakar hati seluruh isi RI,namun mereka masih lagi dalam membuat akaun kira kira akan peperangan yang akan terjadi,antara faktor yang mereka ambil kira adalah:-
a)Angkatan bersama Perjanjian Pertahanan Lima negara.
b)Kebolehan dalam angkatan tentera malaysia.

Disini dalam hal pertama iaiatu (a) tak perlu dibuka,namun amat menarik jika (b)dikupaskan.....
Indonesia sebenarnya amat risau akan peperangan dua negara ini dimana jika diukur secara halus,mereka mendapati mereka tak boleh menandingi ATM secara “single”...
a)Agak gempar apabila peristiwa dimana “600 komando malaysia siap gempur SERB jika tiada negara mahu bantu islam Bosnia”dimana jika kita ambil dari pihak ketiga iaiatu negara eropah,ia bukan lagi rahsia malah pernah panas satu ketika dan didukung oleh adanya fail fail bertajuk “Intelligence and the war in Bosnia 1992 – 1995”-penulisan Dr. Cees Wiebes

b)Sewaktu proses damai antara G.A.M dan TNI dahulu, dimana malaysia menjadi pihak monitor,ada juga terjadi perselisihan kerana dikatakan bahawa malaysia melatih pejuang G.A.M ,kononnya terjumpanya celoreng ATM didalam kubu GAM,namun ia tidak dapat dibuktikan oleh pihak indonesia malahan malaysia dan GAM menafikan ,namun pada febuari 2010 hal ini terjadi lagi dimana terjumpanya “dokumen, wang dan beberapa pasang pakaian seragam yang mirip dengan pakaian tentera Malaysia.”Hal ini masih panas sehingga kini,ini kerana “point” bagi indonesia adalah “sensitif” orang malaysia soal hal islam dan pejuangan islam.
c)Pada 2004,satu kes yang melibatkan 5 anggota tentera malaysia yang dituduh menyusup ke thailand pernah menjadi topik panas, hal ini juga kecoh dikalangan singapura, jika dilihat disini peristiwa ini melihatkan kemampuan dan taktik diguna pakai ATM,jika hal ini benar benar berlaku, sudah pasti ATM akan menjadi paasukan yang paling digeruni dalam ops sulit.Beberapa akhbar juga dikatakan pada waktu itu menjadikan isu itu sebagai pelaris majalah masing masing.
d)Indonesia juga sedar bahawa walaupun secara logiknya, selepas insurgensi kedua PKM tamat, tiada lagi peperangan oleh ATM,namun mereka juga ambil kira akan penglibatan ATM dalam misi PBB sera NATO ISAF serta operasi operasi lain ,dimana mereka sedar setiap misi disertai ATM berisiko berkeadaan peperangan secara tak langsung warga ATM didedahkan kepada situasi sebenar peperangan.tidak seperti TNI yang terpaksa mencipta peperangan dalam negara sendiri disebalik konflik maluku, dan Sampit.

Warga malaysia juga dipuji kerana malas atau “pasif”dalam debat debat tentera antara malaysia dan indonesia dimana mana forum cyberwar kedua dua negara,disini dapat saya kupaskan “cerita “ menarik dari pihak TNI tentang ATM:-
a)Peristiwadimana seorang WNI dibelasah oleh anggota ATM,malah dilaporkan dalam kes itu, seorang anggota TNI turut membelasah WNI itu.Hal ini dikatakan terjadi di sempadan darat antara kalimantan timur dan Sabah.
b)Pihak TNI angkatan udaranya pernah kelam kabut, dimana kononnya pihak awam mereka yang ada dalam daerah tawau memberitahu kepada mereka kononnya pihak TUDM ada meletakkan jet pejuang di lapangan terbang tawau, apapun motif kenyataan pihak TNI-AU itu menunjukkan bahawa kalangan TNI sendiri sudah “emo” hal ini disokong oleh warga indonesia di sabah dan kawasan berdekatan kalimantan timur_kenyataan bodoh pegawai TNI-AU ada dilaporkan dalam satu akhbar indonesia iaiatu VIVANEWS.
c)Didalam satu laporan iaitu http://www.dephan.go.id/modules.php?name=Feedback&op=printpage&opid=221 nampak akan kerisauan indonesia dan TNI dimana mereka sentisa memfokuskan ATM berbanding angkatan tentera jiran lain dimana disini dilihat musuh setandin TNI adaah ATM.....

Dalam konteks pemikiran stategi peperangan,jika hal hal ini benar benar berlaku,indonesia sebenarnya “takut “akan pemintasan ATM mahupun malaysia.Mereka berfikir apa yang berlaku ini dimana rakyat malaysia masih “pasif “ akan hal tentera mereka, jika ia berlaku dimana rakyat malaysia mulai aktif dalam perihal tentera malaysia seperti rakyat singapura pada SAF atau rakyat indonesia dalam hal TNI maka reputasi ATM akan mendadak naik tanpa toleh belakang !.-sedangkan sewaktu zaman pemerintahan Megawati sendiri gagal menjadi atau ikut jejak langkah bapanya,jika ada pun dia sebut ganyang malaysia adalah sebalik agensi berita yang dinaunginya atau bekas bekas askar pencen serta askar yang berpangkat rendah dalam TNI.

komando malaysia:mitos,lagenda atau fakta?-part 2

Masyarakat malaysia dihidangkan dengan warna warni akan  penglibatan Angkatan Tentera Malaysia dalam misi pengaman PBB,namun tak terdedahpun mereka dengan kisah sebalik itu namun jika kita dapati cerita2 sebalik itu ada didedahkan secara berpecah dan satu persatu dibuka untuk tatapan rakyat dan menaikkan martabat negara kita di arena antarabangsa, sekaligus menepis gelaran ASKAR KELABU.....

 "oh !! tentera kami dalam misi  pengaman PBB di bosnia..."-fakta benar tapi cerita lainnya?
     a)Pasukan komando ATM menaungi pasukan NATO dalam memerangi pasukan SERB(yang dibantu oleh crotia,yusgovia serta paraguay) Diman terdapat 2 tim komando malaysia yang digunakan iaiatu PASKAU dan  11 RGK(ULK).
      -pasukan PASKAU diberi tugas untuk menandakan tempat gugurnya peluru berpandu yang dibawa jet pejuang NATO mengunakan penanda laser jenis GLTD.
      -Pasukan ULK kita diberi mandat untuk jadi pasukan atur cepat NATO dimana mereka ini menyelamatkan dan membawa keluar pilot jet NATO yang ditembak jatuh oleh SERB,komando kita terdedah dengan penempak tepat pakatan SERB!
    b)Terdapatnya anggota ATM yang 'derhaka'....dimana mereka ini jadi gerila pejuang bosnia islam yang membantu pejuang islam bosnia berperang dengan SERB-antara yang kita tahu atau buat buat tak tahu adalah Let Kol Abd Manaf Kasmuri yang akhirnya dia ditahan bawah akta keselamatan dalam negeri..
 
  "oh! tentera kami ada dalam misi pengaman di somalia''-benar tapi kenyataan yang tak diketahui?
  a)sewaktu kes condor dipasar Bakara, sejurus  serangan itu, pasukan komando kita ada dalam misi mengejar pasukan Fara Aidid itu yang mencatatkan 2 lagi pahlawan komando kita gugur...
   b)pasukan elit kita iaiatu 11 rgk ULK bersama  anggota 10 PARA kita diberi mandat untuk kawal keselamatan para Komander PBB samaada dalam medan tempur atau penarikan delegasi komander PBB ke kawasan luar.

  "oh!dalam kes teluk Aden,PASKAL hebat!''-Benar ...tapi jangan lupa mereka PASKAL  berganding dengan 11 RGK ULK.....

  yang pasti , apapun  misi dan operasi, tak kira PASKAL,PASKAU,GGK mereka adalah saudara dibawah panji ATM dan mereka ini adalah pejuang yang kita tak pernah ambil tahu nasib untung  mereka, apa lagi dengan seluruh ATM mahupun PDRM......

our brothers in singapore worried we forget them?

This is an article one of them, but those charges true? Evil Are we in malaysia? Hopefully this point that we are more familiar with them there that feels as if we forget about them and threatened them,..... accept “fda if aint broken….”

  “Behind every surviving institution is its purpose and history. Purpose conveys the idea of relevance while history is full of ups and downs and is not necessarily a guide to the future. The multilateral Five Power Defence Arrangements (FPDA) emerged as a successor to a bilateral defence pact during a troubled period of maritime Southeast Asia's history, and survived despite chronic questioning about its purpose. Today, it still has five members, and it still ain't broke, although the recent Asian crisis did create a scare. This paper examines the setting and dynamics involved in the FPDA, and assesses its relevance in the new millennium.

Common Bonds, Enduring Fears

Malaya - a federation of nine small states - became independent from Britain in 1957. Two years later, Britain permitted Singapore to be self-governing. The military bases on the island accommodated not only British forces but also Australian and New Zealand forces (the ANZUK forces). As well, the British continued to help Malayan counter-insurgency forces fight the communist remnants. The Butterworth air base, opposite Penang island in peninsular Malaya, continued to be used by ANZUK air forces while Johor in the south was the location for joint jungle training. British forces were also stationed in British North Borneo (Sabah), Sarawak and the oil-rich protectorate, Brunei.

Thus, when Indonesia under President Sukarno began to oppose Malayan Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman's idea of an enlarged federation (to include Singapore, Brunei, British North Borneo and Sarawak), ANZUK forces were in place in Malaya as well as in the remaining British colonial territories. From one perspective, it can be argued that the proposed new federation, Malaysia, would help to stabilise the sub-region and therefore provide security to the widely scattered Indonesian archipelago. From Sukarno's perspective, however, Malaysia was a neo-colonial creation. Moreover, Sukarno had not been consulted! Sukarno was also facing domestic problems and he wanted to divert attention to foreign policy. His tirades increasingly took on a threatening tone.

In this atmosphere, the 1957 Anglo-Malayan Defence Agreement (AMDA) provided a security umbrella for independent Malaya. AMDA (unlike the future FPDA), was a bilateral defence agreement. When Malaysia was formally created in 1963 (without Brunei's inclusion), AMDA - renamed the Anglo-Malaysian Defence Agreement -continued to provide some measure of security to the new federation. Just as important, ANZUK forces were still based in Butterworth and Singapore. These forces helped Malaysia resist Indonesia's policy of "Confrontation" which included military action or terrorist activities in Johor, Singapore, and Sarawak.

Confrontation engendered an enduring fear of Indonesia as a regional source of instability under certain conditions, such as internal challenges to its unity and the emergence of an "adventurous" ultra-nationalist or religious leader (or leadership). But this common fear did not diffuse domestic tensions between the Malay-dominated central government in Kuala Lumpur (the Malaysian capital) and the Chinese-dominated government in the city-state of Singapore. Racial tensions followed. In August 1965, Singapore separated from Malaysia.

Externally, Britain had meanwhile decided by 1967 to pull out its military forces "east of Suez". Given that Confrontation had by then been effectively countered, and also given that a process of conciliation had begun between Indonesia and Malaysia, the dangerous years could be said to have passed for Malaysia and Singapore. But, because the long history of security cooperation among British, Australian, New Zealand and Malayan/Malaysian forces had always been mutually satisfying, both Malaysia and Singapore were keen to keep some form of this "it ain't broke" security structure going. So were the Australians and New Zealanders. Canberra, in particular, posited forward defence as its strategic doctrine.

By 1971, just such a "coalition of the willing" had emerged - the FPDA - in a formula that imposed no undue strain or obligation on any party. Defence ministers of the five nations met in London on 16 April 1971 to conclude the formation of the FPDA which obliges them to consult each other in the event of an external aggression or threat of such attack against Malaysia and Singapore. There was no requirement for physically stationing multinational forces in Malaysia or Singapore. On 1 September 1971, the five nations decided to form the Integrated Air Defence System (IADS) within the framework of the FPDA to assume responsibility for the air defence of Malaysia and Singapore. Finally, on 1 December 1971, Malaysia and Singapore separately concluded bilateral exchange of notes with the other three partners of the FPDA to effect the new defence arrangements.1

The key term in this multilateral successor to the bilateral AMDA is the plural noun, "arrangements". Yet, many commentators continue to refer, incorrectly, to the "Five Power Defence Arrangement". The FPDA, as described above, is a set of arrangements that allow two parties or more to consult and cooperate under the FPDA rubric in the defence of Malaysia and Singapore. In this sense, this "FPDA minus x" formula predated the famous "ASEAN minus x" formulation! This in-built flexibility has proven useful in practice. For example, the most geographically distant partner, Britain, nevertheless can still assemble the most formidable array of assets for major FPDA exercises. But its absence during a number of years was not seen as a lack of commitment.

Flexibility apart, gradualism was another FPDA hallmark. For a whole decade, the IADS was about the most active component of the FPDA, with air defence exercises conducted annually since 1972. Then, in 1980, the leaders of the five countries decided to initiate regular land and naval exercises. Between 1981 and 1986, Australia and New Zealand alternately hosted annual FPDA land exercises. In 1987, Malaysia hosted its first land exercise and in 1989, Singapore was the host. The 1990 land exercise was held in Malaysia but hosted by Britain. Sea exercises, also held since 1981, are alternately hosted by Malaysia and Singapore in the South China Sea.2

Apart from the usefulness of the various exercise series, the FPDA - especially in the early years - provides the teeth for a vital aspect of the defence of Malaysia and Singapore: the Integrated Air Defence System (IADS) located at Butterworth, under an Australian commander. This deliberate decision was a practical one, given the unspoken discomfort Malaysian and Singaporean leaders would have in having an IADS commander from either country.

Certainly, the FPDA played a useful role in confidence-building between Malaysia and Singapore, especially in the early post-separation years when bilateral external security cooperation between the two countries (other than the unbroken internal security cooperation) was all but absent. Importantly, the creation of the IADS symbolised the indivisibility of the defence of peninsular Malaysia and Singapore. Illustrative of the FPDA's gradual evolutionary nature, the IADS itself has proven to be adaptive, and is being transformed into the Integrated Area Defence System. This name change reflects the emphasis on joint activities.

Finally, on the issue of deterrence, although leaders of the two regional countries have not pretended that the legacy of Indonesia's Confrontation had affected their security perceptions, the FPDA is best seen as providing a form of "potential" deterrence, in which no actual enemy is identified.3 Some observers have referred to the "psychological deterrence" provided by the FPDA; others note that Australian F/A-18 fighter jets based in Tindal in northern Australia are only a few hours flight time from the sub-region.

FPDA in the New Millennium

If the several features of the FPDA proved its resilience since 1971, predicated on commonsensical "it ain't broke" premises and gradual enhancement comfortable to all its members, what possible challenges to its relevance may be identified in the new millennium?

The impression should not be given that the FPDA did not have its share of structural weaknesses, political difficulties, intra-mural tensions and viability questions. In the first place, the external powers are not obligated to come to the defence of the two regional powers since the FPDA carries no treaty obligations. In addition, although the IADS does have a command structure, the FPDA itself does not. Politically, although Indonesia was not identified as the potential threat to be deterred, it cannot be said to be enthusiastic about the existence of a set of defence arrangements which arose in the aftermath of Confrontation. Much credit could be given to the previous Suharto administration for its passive acquiescence in accepting Malaysia and Singapore's membership of the FPDA as part and parcel of the regional web of bilateral and multilateral security links outside the ASEAN framework. One may also speculate that Brunei's "lukewarm" interest in the FPDA has been due to sensitivity to Indonesia's possible reaction. One novel Indonesian attempt to revisit the FPDA concept arose in 1990 when former foreign minister Mochtar Kusuma-atmadja suggested in a regional journal article that the FPDA be gradually disbanded over a period of five years and a new Three-Power Defence Arrangement be created comprising only Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. He felt that the "abandonment of the [FPDA] by Malaysia and Singapore would immeasurably strengthen the political and psychological basis for the continued growth of a three-power ASEAN military cooperation".4 He added that Australia could participate in the proposed pact's joint exercises as a "friendly neighbouring power".5

Problems in the political relationship between Malaysia and Singapore have also affected the FPDA. The most recent was Malaysia's last-minute withdrawal from a major maritime exercise (Stardex) in 1998. Kuala Lumpur said its decision was a result of the Asian economic and financial crisis but observers noted that it came at a time when Malaysia-Singapore relations were affected by a number of issues. However, Malaysia resumed its participation of Stardex in 1999.

There is always the question of sustaining the interest of external partners in any security arrangement. The FPDA has been no exception. Britain did not take part in the air defence/maritime exercise Lima Bersatu for more than a decade and only resumed its participation since 1988. The present Labour government in Britain shows its interest in engagement with FPDA partners but it cannot be said that future governments - Labour or Conservative -will be similarly disposed. New Zealand's involvement has been comparatively modest and indeed, the current government has indicated its strategic focus is its immediate neighbourhood. Australia, on the other hand, continues to play an active role in the FPDA. Indeed, whereas during the Suharto era, when some Australian commentators had suggested that the country's involvement in the FPDA might be a disincentive with regards to closer Canberra-Jakarta ties, the situation today may be the opposite. The FPDA continues to provide Australia with a regional presence.

In sum, the FPDA has not faced any major challenge since its inception because of two principal reasons. First, its purpose and design were pragmatic, demanding not too much from its "coalition of the willing". Secondly, Indonesia under Suharto had chosen to accommodate the FPDA which in turn has always been sensitive to Jakarta, such as conducting its major maritime exercises in the South China Sea. But circumstances can change. The very fact of its flexible arrangement means that any member who has become "less willing" can leave the FPDA, thus weakening both the indivisible defence of peninsular Malaysia and Singapore element and the so-called psychological deterrence element. Conceivably, a more assertive Indonesia may in future raise questions about the FPDA's relevance.

Conclusion

The FPDA is an example of the "if it ain't broke" phenomenon, discussed in this paper. It has played an important role in the stability and regional security of maritime Southeast Asia. The major concern of regional security analysts today is whether the two important bilateral US security treaties with Japan and South Korea will survive. Already, the trilateral ANZUS alliance has been allowed to languish, although US-Australian security cooperation is still sustained. If the FPDA were to lapse, it will be missed. Once broke, it can never be fixed. “

This paper was presented as part of the ASEAN Regional Forum's professional development programme for foreign affairs and defence officials held in Brunei Darussalam from 23 to 28 April 2000.

 Rujukan: 1 Singapore Ministry of Defence Fact Sheet, 22 August 1988.
                  2 Straits Times, 23 April 1991.
                   3 Stephen Cimbala, Military Persuasion, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University       Press, 1994, p. 21.
                      4 Mochtar Kusuma-atmadja, "Some Thoughts on ASEAN Security Cooperation: An Indonesian Perspective," Contemporary Southeast Asia, December 1990, p. 170.       

‘Indonesian Confrontation 1964-1965’ (*1)

The operations always retained a high level of secrecy. When 3 RAR arrived it had to patrol on the Malaysian side of the border for a mandatory period of one month before it could begin Claret Operations.

The incursions into mainland Malaysia in the latter half of 1964 brought Indonesia and Malaysia (with its British and Australian allies) close to war, and in September some British planners talking of conducting sea and air strikes against Indonesian bases. Instead. Walker was authorised to conduct operations up to 5000 yards (4570 metres) across the Indonesian border. The strictest secrecy was observed and the 'Claret' operations, as they were known, were aimed at ambushing Indonesian troops and supply parties as they moved towards the border. By the end of the year Walker had eighteen British battalions (including eight Gurkha and two Royal Marine Commandos) and three Malay battalions in Borneo. Also at the end of the year he was given permission to extend his operations up to 10 000 yards (9140 metres) across the border. 

• The 'Golden Rules' for Claret operations were as follows:
  • Every operation to be authorised by DOBOPS [Walker]. 
  • Only trained and tested troops to be used. 
  • Depth of penetration to be limited and the attacks must only be made to thwart offensive action by the enemy. 
  • No operation which required close air support-except in an extreme emergency-must be undertaken. 
  • Every operation must be planned with the aid of a sand-table and thoroughly rehearsed for at least two weeks.
  •  Each operation to be planned and executed with maximum security. 
  • Every man taking part must be sworn to secrecy, full cover plans must be made and the operations to be given code-names and never discussed in detail on telephone or radio. 
  • Identity discs must be left behind before departure and no traces-such as cartridge cases, paper, ration packs, etc-must be left in Kalimantan. 
  • On no account must any soldier taking part be captured by the enemy-alive or dead.

These rules were later eased, but the operations always retained a high level of secrecy. When 3 RAR arrived it had to patrol on the Malaysian side of the border for a mandatory period of one month before it could begin Claret operations.

and 590 Indonesian troops were killed. 
During the Communists' armed struggle (1965-1973), 190 communists wre killed in Indonesia and 340 in Sarawak.  




  

  

komando malaysia:mitos,lagenda atau fakta?-part 1

   Bila sebut sahaja tentera ,pasti ramai anak muda teruja dan perkataan pertama adalah komando-sesuatu yang positif namun jangan lupa pada infanteri...
    Komado ataupun istilah modennya adalah pasukan khas merupakan satu entiti yang dikagumi dan digeruni walaupun tak didendang seperti pejuang politik  hari ini.Ada yang mengatakan bahawa pasukan elit pertama malaysia adalah gerup 21 GGK bahkan ada mengatakan bahawa  Very Able TRooper 1969-VAT69 merupakan pasukan elit terawal...!tidak sama sekali, pasukan pertama elit milik kita adalah SARAWAK RANGERS a.k.a Iban trackers yang ditubuhkan semenjak sezaman Rentap lagi.....inilah fakta misteri bukan?.
   Dizaman pasca moden,pasukan ini berkekuatan satu kompeni iaiati dalam   lingkungan 150 kebawah kekuatan dan dipecahkan kedalam pasukan elit milik britain serta australia walau begitu mereka juga sering dipinjamakan kedalam pasukan komando New zealand.Sebagai pengesan, peninjau dan  barisan hadapan dalam sesuatu operasi.
  Sarawak RANGERS,telah dibubarkan sewaktu p-enubuhan negara malaysia,  waktu itu mereka diberi pilihan samaada mahu teruskan kerjaya tentera atau kembali kepangkuan awam,namun mereka memilih untuk terus berjuang maka tertubuhnya pasukan terawal Rejimen Pertama Renger  Malaysia,mereka adalah nukleus awal.....namun begitu mereka sering dipinjam pinjam oleh british, australia, gurka mahupun new zealand kerana kepakaran mereka yang tiada tolok bandingnya  malah diperakui oleh orang barat itu.....Antara yang kita terlupa, dalam pembebasan brunei sewaktu penganas indonesia bawah pimpinan AZAHARI mahu rampas brunei,beberapa anggota iban trackers ini dibawa kesana oleh britain untuk hancurkan penganas indonesia itu sehinggalah pengg anas indonesia itu lari .Sewaktu OPS CLARET dimana pasukan elit Britain dan Australia menyusup ke kawasan indonesia, iban trackers juga dibawa berjuang ke sana sehingga kan ada antara mereka mati disana,hal ini tak di  dinafikan pasukan australia yang ada di novelkan oleh  australia bagi mengabadikan sejarah pahit maung orang orang lama....
   Secara tak rasminya pasukan rejimen pertama renjer diraja ,adalah pasukan elit yang pertama dan terawal dari kalangan bumi malaysia.
  Rentetan dari sejarah sarawak rangers itulah maka pihak angkatan tentera malaysia mahukan pasukan serupa dikalangan anak tanah melayu, maka setelah ujian berat dibuat, maka ada yang layak menjadi komando milik angkatan tentera diraja malaysia iaiatu GERUP  21 KDO yang gunakan perkataan komando pada 1965, dikuti komando hutan oleh polis malaysia iaiatu VAT69 pada 1969.
   Perlu diperakui walaupun iban trackers tak guna istilah Special atau Elit pada nama , namun mereka amat elit dan serupa dengan UK special airfoce service dimana seawalnya mereka guna nama COUNTER REVOLUTIONARY WARFARE WING(CRW)tak lupa pada satu lagi pasukan elit yang tak guna istilah elite aiaitu BRAVO 5 atau lebih glamour digelar SENOI PRAQ dimana kini mereka digabungkan di bawah panji VAT69 PDRM.

   cuba korang  pergi kepautan ini
http://www.freewebs.com/40cdoassoc/apps/photos/photo?photoid=42143965

PANAS:PERISIK SINGAPURA DITAHAN DIKAWASAN MALAYSIA?

出海钓鱼遭带返军营盘问　2华青被冠“间谍”罪名

CUBA LAWATI :
http://cnews.cari.com.my/news.php?id=78576

 

字体： [ 最大 大 中 小 ]

•国内 •国内新闻 •2011-06-13 00:06 •点击数：282 •新闻由光华日报提供 • 评 • 顶

■ 周苍佑示范当时如何被锁上手铐及盘问。

（新山12日讯）2名华青相约出海钓鱼，却在前往途中遭士兵带返附近军营盘问，盘问期间，除了被蒙上脸外，两人更遭问话军官掌掴以及遭橙汁淋头羞辱，不断被套上“间谍”的莫须有罪名。
两名受害者分别为周苍佑（24岁）与陈国彬（26岁），两人是于5月26日趁着工作午休时间，于上午11时30分，前往振林山的甘榜德宾仁都处垂钓。
途中，他们遭一名身着便服与军裤的士兵拦下，那个士兵说有问题要问他们，并没收了两人的身份证，再把他们带往甘榜德宾仁都处旁边的军营里。
开始时士兵态度友善
起初，周苍佑表示，在军营内10多名身着便服的普通士兵对他们态度友善，还供他们吃喝，惟不久后，一名士兵接到来电后，便向他们说了一句“对不起”，之后就将他们双眼蒙上。
双眼被蒙上后，周苍佑当时便听到一辆车子抵达的声音，之后便有口操马来话的军官开始向他两进行盘问。
军官第一句就问陈国彬‘你是来钓鱼还是工作’，阿陈（陈国彬别名）便答钓鱼，讵料，阿陈突然遭到该军官以掌掴问候，军官再问多一次同样的题，阿陈也以钓鱼为答案，便再受到掌掴多一次。
该名军官之后检查两人的钱包以及电话等，更以他电话里有3个以前与友人在百万镇海番村的拍摄的短片为由，指该短片是为了售给他国，还大声询问他到底拿了该国多少钱。
由于不承认对方的指责，周氏也被该军官打了一巴掌。
对方也尝试以离间计，离间两人，那个军官曾向陈国彬说悄悄话，事后陈国彬指那名军官是要他指证周苍佑为间谍，倘若这么做，陈国彬就会被放，但陈国彬始终不肯开口。
除了进行盘问之外，军官也检查两人的轿车，当时，还把两人的眼罩拆下，周苍佑当时看到4名士兵，包括一位身穿“一个马来西亚”蓝色T恤的问话军官，一名负责摄影以及两名负责看顾他们的士兵。
由于搜不出其他有疑的物品，该名军官便拿着陈国彬的手机，问其父母的电话和住家地址，还问阿陈的收入多少，还要胁日后会跟他要钱。之后，他们再度被押回军营，接受第二名军官的问话。
军营范围500米　平民不得踏入
军官甚至指称，平民不得踏入军营范围500米之内。
周苍佑续称，另一名军官盘问他们时指称，平民不得踏入军营范围500米之内，更质问两人没上学吗？
陈国彬直指回应，指学校根本没教过，立即遭那个军官以橙汁冷饮当头淋下；陈国彬也直指当地根本就没有警示牌，更被军官用厚厚的书敲打。
也是新加坡公民的周苍佑也表示，他曾在新国服过两年兵役，所以熟知在兵营外犯事，都只是由警方逮捕，但是该名军官却指“两国的军纪完全不同”，更指本身是以军队法律执法，更恐吓随时能把两人关在大监狱一两年。
他曾向该名军官要求将两人送往警局查办，但军官都没有理会。
此外，周氏也指该军官“鸡蛋里挑骨头”，特意刁难他们，在其钱包内寻获一个装有宗教符牌的包装袋时，还未拆开，便指里头是藏有白粉。
终于，在军官们离开后，士兵便马上替两人解开手铐和眼罩，还一直向两人说道歉。
两人于4时30分离开该军营后，便马上回到工作岗位报备，之后在晚间8时许，到皇后花园的警局报案。
周苍佑表示，在27日上午，警方再度要求他们前往努沙再也警局协助调查，当时警局也召来了7名军士协查，之后还重返现场查看。
两人之后也向行动党士古来区州议员巫程豪投诉，巫程豪表示，已针对此案，于昨日致函国防部，也希望该部会对此进行调查。
由于有公事在身，陈国彬并未出现今日召开的新闻发布会。
他也提醒军士们，他们的职责是保护民众，而不是伤害民众；他之后也曾到事发地点视察，确实没有发现任何警示牌，任何事件的发生，军方都应该把事件交由警方处理，或对犯错者提出警告，而不是动用私刑。
证实已接获投报　警不偏袒任何一方
另一方面，努沙再也警区主任阿都阿兹受询及此案时，证实警方已接获投报，并表示警方已完成案件的调查，目前并交由副检察署采取进一步行动。
他说，警方是援引刑事法典第342条文（非法禁锢）与第323条文（蓄意伤人），调查此案。
询及共有多少人针对此案被带往警局问话，以协助调查，他则不愿透露，仅表示警方没有偏袒任何一方。
警方相信，此案的发生可能是因技术问题所致，因为军人也需要执行他们的任务。
记者之后也前往事发地点查看，当地确实没有警示牌或告示牌，反而都是钓鱼与租借钓鱼船的告示牌。
两人指被军人拦下的地方，更是渔村的甘榜小路，虽然路旁有哨站，但此小路是附近渔民每日必须行经之路。
当地村民也指出，这里时常都有人前来垂钓，而此村一向安详，是个“世外桃源”。
 kita gunakan translate google....

"'■ Zhou Cang Yu demonstration was handcuffed and questioned how it was locked. (News 12 New Hill) 2 Huaqing similar sea fishing, but in the way by soldiers brought back to the barracks near the cross-examination, during cross-examination, in addition to being over his face, the two men were questioned by officers slapped and poured orange juice head humiliation, constantly referred to as "spy" trumped-up charges.
Two of the victims were Cang Zhou Yu (24 years) and Chen Guobin (26 years), two are on May 26, taking advantage of the working lunch break at 11:30, at the Kampong Zhenlin Durbin Jen Hill are at fishing.
The way they were dressed in civilian clothes and trousers of a soldier stopped, the soldiers said that there are questions to ask them, and they confiscated the identity cards, then they are taken to Kampong Durbin at the next camp Jen years.
When the soldiers began a friendly attitude
At first, Zhou Cang Yu said that in the barracks more than 10 soldiers dressed in civilian clothes in general are friendly to them, but also for them to eat and drink, but soon after, a soldier, after receiving the call, they would they say "sorry", after They will be blindfolded.
Blindfolded, Zhou Cang Yu arrived in a car when they heard the voice, speaking after the Malay population, then there's two officers began to cross-examine him.
The first sentence on the officer asked Chen Guobin, 'You come fishing or work,' Ah Chen (Chen Guobin alias) will answer fishing, Ju material, A Chan was suddenly slapped the officer in regards to military officers to ask once more the same title, A Chen also fishing for the answer, then no longer be slapped once more.
After checking both of the officer's wallet and phone, but in his three previous phone with friends in the Fan Village Zhenhai million short film on the grounds, means that the video is to sell his country, but also loudly asked He took in the end how much of the country.
Because they do not recognize each other's accusations, Zhou was also slapped the officer.
The other to try to drive a wedge between total and divide the two, the officer told Chen Guobin whisper, after Chen Guobin means that the officer was asking him to testify Cang Zhou Yu as the spy, if to do so, Chen Guobin will be put, but Chen Guobin always refused to open.
In addition to cross-examination, the officers also checked the two cars, when they also removed the goggles, Zhou Cang Yu who saw four soldiers, including one wearing a "Malaysia" blue T-shirt of the questioning officers , one for photography and two responsible for the look after their soldiers.
As the search no doubt other items, the officer will be holding Chen Guobin phone, the phone and ask their parents home address, also asked Ah Chen's income, but also threaten the future will be with him for money. After that, they were escorted back to camp again, accept the second officer's questions.
Barracks shall not enter the range of 500 meters civilians
Officers and even alleged that civilians must not enter the barracks within 500 meters of range.
Zhou Cang Yu added that another officer, when questioning their allegations, the scope of the civilian population shall not enter within 500 meters of the barracks, but did not question the two go to school?
Chen Guobin directed to respond, saying the school did not teach before, immediately by the officer to take the lead leaching under cold orange juice; Chen Guobin are simply not directed at the local warning signs, but is a thick book with a beat officer.
Zhou Cang is a Singapore citizen Yu also said that he had served two years in the new national military service, so well known outside the offenders in the barracks, just arrested by the police, but the officer was referred to as "the two countries is completely different discipline," but also refers to itself is the military law enforcement, they can be more threatening at any time one or two years locked up in a large prison.
He told the police officer asked the two men sent to investigate, but the officers did not care.
In addition, Zhou also referred to the officer, "splitting hairs", deliberately making things difficult for them, found a wallet in their religious character card with the bag when not open, it refers to the possession of a white powder inside.
Finally, the officers left, the soldiers will immediately unlock the handcuffs and goggles for two, has also been said to both apologize.
They left at 4:30 in the barracks, they will immediately be reported back to work, after 8 o'clock at night, to the Queen's Gardens police report.
Zhou Cang Yu said that in the 27 am, the police asked them again to assist in the investigation Nusajaya police, was also summoned police sergeant and an investigation of seven, then also return to the scene view.
They later also to the ancient district's Action Party state legislator Wu Chenghao who complained, Wu Chenghao that is optimized for the case, yesterday sent a letter to Department of Defense, the Department will also want to investigate.
Because there are official in the body, Chen Guobin does not appear today at a press conference.
He also reminded the sergeant who, their duty is to protect people, not hurt people; after he has inspected the site of the incident, did not find any warning signs, the occurrence of any event, the military should deal with the incident to the police , or a warning for wrongdoers, rather than the use of lynching.
Confirmed that he had not received a vote in favor of any party alarm
On the other hand, Nusajaya District Director Abdul Aziz and the case by the inquiry, confirmed police had received a vote reported, and said that police have completed investigations, the current Deputy Attorney General and by the Department for further action.
He said police quoted the provisions of Penal Code section 342 (false imprisonment) and the provisions of section 323 (wounding with intent), to investigate the case.
Asked how many people the case was taken to the police station for questioning, to assist in the investigation, he declined to disclose only that the police did not take sides.
Police believe the case may occur due to technical problems caused because soldiers need to perform their tasks.
Reporters also went after the incident to view the local is really no warning signs or signs, but fishing is fishing and boat rental signs.
They mean the soldiers stopped the place, it is the fishing village of Kampung road, although roadside outpost, but this path is near the fishermen have to pass through the road daily.
Local villagers also pointed out that there are people who come here from time to time fishing, and this village has been peaceful, is a "paradise."


Apakah yang kita lihat di gambar?cuba perhatikan lambang itu.......ERMMMMMMMMMMMM

Senarai tahanan ISA

Ini merupakan senarai senarai Pecahan tahanan ISA :-

Jemaah Islamiah	18 orang	Mereka dikaitkan dengan Al Qaeda
Daulah Islamiyah / Darul Islam Sabah	17 orang	beroperasi di Tawau, Sabah keturunan Filipina
Pemalsuan wang syiling RM1	17 orang	Wang syiling dihapuskan.
Pemalsuan dokumen pengenalan	29 orang
Pemalsuan pasport rakyat China
Penyeludupan pendatang asing tanpa izin (PATI)
Gerakan Militan Selatan Thailand, Pejuang Pemisah Selatan Thailand	7 orang
Agen perisik asing	7 orang

Berikut adalah senarai nama tahanan

Berikut merupakan senarai tahanan dan bekas tahanan yang diletakkan di bawah ISA.

Tarikh	Nama	Tempoh Tahanan	Pekerjaan / Biodata	Alasan Penahanan
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Koh Pak Ngee		Penolong Setiausaha Agung Barisan Sosialis (SF), Ketua Editor NYALA, organ parti SF, calon Parlimen SF bagi Pilihan Raya Umum 1959
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Foo Seong Foh		24 tahun, juruteknik Lembaga Letrik Negara, Pengerusi Parti Pekerja Malaya (LMP) cawangan Jinjang, kaunselor pelajar yang dipilih pada 1957, Pengerusi majlis tempatan Jinjang
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Chen Po An		Bendahari Cawangan Ampang
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Li Jian Xing		Setiausaha , Cawangan RM Petaling Jaya
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Tang Bing Ying		Setiausaha , SF Selangor State
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Chen Hai Chou		Exco, PRM Perak State cum Chairman, PRm Ipoh Branch
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Liu Xiao Houa		Age 25 , setiausaha Parti Pekerja Malaya (LMP) cawangan Jinjang , salesman
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Hu Rong Shen		Treasurer, PRM Perak State cum Pengerusi, PRM CaeangnIpoh Branch
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Li Wen Qing		Ahli ,LPM Jinjang Banch
1960, 5 November, at dawn	Gu Tian Fu		Age 21, Worker of Serdang Vew Village Local Council, former Jonior 3 student of Chung Huwa High School Kuala Lumpur , detained on 1 October 1985 under the Emergency Ordinace 1948(EO) for almost a year.
1960, 5 November, at dawn	Huang Hai Qiu		Age 22, Former Junior @ student of Tsun Jin High School Kuala Lumpur, detained on 1 October 1958 for a year plus, released in December 1959, worker of the Serdang New Village Local Council
1960, 5 November, at dawn	Yang Nan Xun		Worker in the Serdang Vew Village Local Council, foemer Senior @ student of Confucian High School Kuala Lumpur r, detained on 1 october 1958 for a year, relased with conditions.
1960, 5 November, at dawn	Liang Wen Hong		Age 23,Worker of Serdang Vew Village Local Council, former Junior 2 student of Chung Hwa High School kuala Lumpur , later studied in a private English school, detained on 1 October 1958, released on conditions a year later.
1960, 5 November, midnight	Ma Hui Qun		Age 24, Female teache, charged in court, detained again upon payment of fine
1960, 5 November, midnight	Ma Ming Xin@Ma Jin		Age 22
1960, 2 November	Shi Song		An insurance company staff
1960, 5 November, tengah malam	Jian Hua Yang		Age 18, Senior 1 student of Han Chiang High School Penang, Discharged by court but detained again by police.
1960, 12 November, tengah malam	Jin De Sun		Age 18,Senior 1 student of Han Chiang High School Penang, Discharged by court but detained again by police.
1960, 10 November, tengah malam	Su Zhu Tai		Age 15, Junior student of Chung Hwa High school Kuala Lumpur
1960, 10 November,tengah malam	Chen Zhang		Age 15,Junior student of Chung Hwa High School Kuala Lumpur
1960, 10 November, at 5.20am	Zhong De Ling (F)		age 15,Senior 3 student of Chung Hwa High School Kuala Lumpur
1960, 10 November	Qiu An		Pelajar
1960, 10 November	Kong Me		Pelajar
1960, 10 November	Kang Zi Kai		Pelajar
1960, 10 November	Lin Hui Huang		Guru
1960, 10 November	He Hui Fang		Pelajar
1960, 10 November	Tan Xin Jie		Pelajar
1960, 10 November	Fok Yee Seng		Pelajar
1960, 20 November, at 6.15am	Chen Ya Xi @ Chen Yu Reng		Age 17, Senior student of Hua Kiao High School Singapore
1960, 20 November, at 6.15am	He Guang Peng		St Michael Secondary English School
1960, 20 November, at 6.15am	Liu Xing Mei (F)		Senior student of Hua Kiao High School
1960, 10 November	Soo Bing Choon		Age 30, Secretary General, the Malayan Federation of Pineapple Workers Unions
1960, 10 November	Zhen Zhong Rong		Age 19, PRM member.
1961, 14 January, at dawn	Chen Xiu Lian		Age 21, Female Student
1961, 14 January, at dawn	Zhen Shi Sheng		Age 18, Rubber tapper Student
1961, 14 January, at dawn	Lai Bing Zhang		Age 25
1961, 14 January, at dawn	Ye Guo Zhong		Age 21 Senior Student of Confucian High School Kuala Lumpur
1961, 14 January, at dawn	Qiu Yu Jiao (F)		Age 19, Rubber tapper
1961, 14 January, at dawn	Liu Guo Chang		Age 19, Rubber tapper
1961, 14 January, at dawn	Chen Si Ting		Age 24, Treasurer, PRM Semenyih Branch, rubber tapper.
1961, 14 January, at dawn	Jiang Jing Hua		Age 22
1974	Anwar Ibrahim	20 bulan	Pelajar
1987	Lim Kit Siang	2 Tahun	Setiausaha Agung DAP	Operasi Lalang
1987	Chandra Muzaffar	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	Presiden ALIRAN Presiden Chandra Muzaffar	Operasi Lalang
1987	Chan Kit Chee	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	MCA Vice President and Perak	Operasi Lalang
1987	Karpal Singh	2 Tahun	Timbalan Pengerusi DAP	Operasi Lalang
1987	Halim Arshat	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	Ketua Dewan Pemuda PAS	Operasi Lalang
1987	Ibrahim Ali	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	UMNO MP for Pasir Mas	Operasi Lalang
1987	Fahmi Ibrahim	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	Pemuda UMNO (Pendidikan)	Operasi Lalang
1987	Dong Jiao Zhong	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	Chinese Education Associations	Operasi Lalang
1987	Lim Fong Seng	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	Chairman Chinese Education Associations	Operasi Lalang
1987	Kua Kia Soong	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	Publicity Chief of the Civil Rights Committee	Operasi Lalang
1987	Irene Xavier	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	WAO Member	Operasi Lalang
1987	Hilmy Noor	dibebas dengan atau tanpa syarat	accused for "disrupting the Malay culture by being a Christian"	Operasi Lalang
1990-1991	Abdul Rahman Ahmad		Assistant Superintendent of Police, Special Branch	ditangkap semasaOperasi Talkak
1990-1991	Albinus Yudah		opposition party member, member of Kadazan Cultural Association	ditangkap semasaOperasi Talkak
1990-1991	Benedict Topin		opposition party member, Executive Secretary of Kadazan Cultural Association	ditangkap semasaOperasi Talkak
1990-1991	Damit Undikai		retired Special Branch police officer	ditangkap semasaOperasi Talkak
1990-1991	Jeffrey Kitingan		ahli politik pembangkang, pengarah Institut Development Studies	ditangkap semasaOperasi Talkak
1990-1991	Maximus Ongkili		timbalan pengarah Institute for Development Studies	ditangkap semasaOperasi Talkak
1990-1991	Vincent Chung		pentadbir, Sabah Foundation	ditangkap semasaOperasi Talkak
1998	Anwar Ibrahim		Timbalan Perdana Menteri
2001	Yazid Sufaat		Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2001	Suhaimi_Mokhtar		Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2001	Raja Petra Kamarudin	52 hari	Ahli Blog Malaysia Today
2002	Dr Abdullah Daud	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2002	Shamsuddin Sulaiman	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Dibebaskan pada 3 September 2010[7]
2002	Mat Shah Mohd Satray	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2002	Abdul Murad Sudin	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2002	Zaini Zakaria	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui(Masih ditahan di KDC - ATP 2580/03)
2002	Zainun Rashid	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2003	Wan Amin Wan Hamat	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2003	Sulaiman Suramin	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2003	Sufian Salih	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2003	Mohd Khaider Kadran	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah (pemimpin)	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2003	Hasim Talib	6 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2004	Zakaria bin Samad	4 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah - warga Indonesia	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2004	Ahmad Zakaria	4 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah - warga Indonesia	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2004	Terhamid bin Dahalan	4 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah - warga Indonesia	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2005	Abdul Rahman Ahmad @ Deraman Koteh	4 tahun	Alleged militant separatist of Thailand	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2005	Mahfudi Saifuddin	4 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah - warga Indonesia	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2005	Mulyadi	4 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah - warga Indonesia	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2005	Arifin	4 tahun	Suspek pengganas Jemaah Islamiyah - warga Indonesia	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2005	Mat Tarmizi Zakaria	4 tahun	Alleged Thai separatist	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2005	Lai Kin Choy	4 tahun	Alleged counterfeiter	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	A Artas A Burhanuddin	2 tahun	Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah" from Tawau	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Francis Indanan	2 tahun	Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah" from Tawau	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Mohd Nazri Dollah	2 tahun	Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah" from Tawau	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Mohd Arasad Patangari	2 tahun	Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah" from Tawau	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Adzmi Pindatun	2 tahun	Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah" from Tawau	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Idris Lanama	2 tahun	Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah" from Klang	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Aboud Ghafar Shahril	2 tahun	Indonesian; Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah"	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Jeknal Adil	2 tahun	stateless; Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah"	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Binsali Omar	2 tahun	Filipino (Malaysian PR); Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah"	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Husin Alih	2 tahun	Filipino national; Ahli "Darul Islam Sabah"	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Yussof Mohd Salam	2 tahun	Filipino national; Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah"	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Abd Jamal Azahari	2 tahun	Filipino national; Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah"	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Pakana Selama	2 tahun	PR status; Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah"	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Kasem Dayama	2 tahun	Warganegara asing; Didakwa terlibat orang luar	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Shaykinar Guat	2 tahun	stateless; Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah"	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Argadi Andoyok	2 tahun	stateless; Alleged member of "Darul Islam Sabah"	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Ng How Chuang	2 tahun	Dakwaan pemalsuan dokumen	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Ng Keat Seng	2 tahun	Dakwaan pemalsuan dokumen	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2006	Mohd Azuan b Aniffa	2 tahun	Didakwa terlibat orang luar	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Mohd Faizol Shamsudin	2 tahun	Didakwa terlibat orang luar	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Zulfikli Abu Bakar	2 tahun	Didakwa terlibat orang luar	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Zulfikli Marzuki	2 tahun	Member of Parliament	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Amir Hussain	2 tahun	Warganegara asing; Dakwaan pemalsuan dokumen	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Mohd Nasir Ismail	2 tahun	Didakwa terlibat dengan JI	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Ahmad Kamil Hanafiah	2 tahun	Didakwa terlibat dengan JI	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Muh Amir Hanafiah	2 tahun	Didakwa terlibat dengan JI	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Tan Choon Chin	2 tahun	Dakwaan pemalsuan dokumen	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Mavalavan	2 tahun	Didakwa terlibat orang luar	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Lian Kok Heng	2 tahun	Didakwa terlibat orang luar	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	Sundaraj Vijay	2 tahun	Warganegara asing; Dakwaan pemalsuan dokumen	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	San Khaing	2 tahun	Warganegara asing; Dakwaan pemalsuan dokumen	Tidak diketahui (masih ditahan di KDC)
2007	K. Kengadhadran	2 tahun	Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer)	Menguruskan perhimpunan Hindraf di Kuala Lumpur pada November 2007. Released on April-3rd 2009
2007	M. Manoharan	2 tahun	Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer)	Menguruskan perhimpunan Hindraf di Kuala Lumpur pada November 2007. Released on May-9th 2009
2007	P. Uthayakumar,	2 tahun	Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer)	Menguruskan perhimpunan Hindraf di Kuala Lumpur pada November 2007. Released on May-9th 2009
2007	T. Vasantha Kumar	2 tahun	Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer)	Menguruskan perhimpunan Hindraf di Kuala Lumpur pada November 2007. Released on May-9th 2009
2007	K. Ganabathi Rao	2 tahun	Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer) Menguruskan perhimpunan Hindraf di Kuala Lumpur pada November 2007. Released on April-3rd 2009
2008	Muhammad Zahid Haji Zahir Shah	2 tahun	Tidak diketahui	Tidak diketahui(Masih ditahan di KDC - ATP 2703/2008)
2008	Shadul Islam	2 tahun	Tidak diketahui	Tidak diketahui(Masih ditahan di KDC - ATP 2698/2008)
2008	Abdul Sathar Mohammad Sarjoon	2 tahun	Tidak diketahui	Tidak diketahui(Masih ditahan di KDC - ATP 2699/2008)
2008	Faycal Mamdouh	2 tahun	Tidak diketahui	Tidak diketahui(Masih ditahan di KDC - ATP 2700/2008)
2008	Mahamad Nakhrakhel	2 tahun	Tidak diketahui	Tidak diketahui(Masih ditahan di KDC - ATP 2701/2008)
2008	Muhammad Shuaib Hazrat Bilal	2 tahun	Tidak diketahui	Tidak diketahui(Masih ditahan di KDC - ATP 2702/2008)
2008	Raja Petra Kamarudin	56 hari 2 jam 10 minit	Ahli Blog Malaysia Today	Dakwaan menghina Agama Accused of insulting Islam. Juga didakwa atas Akta Hasutan pada artikel bertajuk "Let's Send the Altantuya Murderers to Hell" yang diterbitkan pada laman MalaysiaToday [1]
2008	Tan Hoon Cheng	18 jam	Wartawan, Sin Chew Jit Poh	Accused of writing a fact (on Ahmad Ismail's Incendiary Racist Remarks) that may incite hatred among the Malay and Chinese.
2008	Teresa Kok Suh Sim	7 hari	Ahli Parlimen, Seputeh	menghina Islam
2008	Cheng Lee Whee	2 hari	Suaram activist, Johor	Menghina polis[8]
2009	Mas Selamat Kastari	2 tahun	Ketua Militan Jemaah Islamiah Singapura (JI)

Selain itu, antara nama nama yang di tahan dalam ISA(ada antaranya sudah dijatuhi hukuman mati) adalah;-
a)Wong swee chin(BOTAK CHIN)-16 feb 1976-hukuman mati pada 11 jun 1981)
b)Hj Muhammmad Senapi( 1985)-Ops Angkara\ hapus)- dibebaskan
c)Moammed Amin( julai 2001)-Kes Al Maunah)-hukuman mati
d)Zahid Muslim ( julai 2001)-Kes Al Maunah)-hukuman mati
e)Jamaluddin Darus ( julai 2001)-Kes Al Maunah)-hukuman mati

Beberapa individu juga pernah ditahan apabila mereka sentuh rahsia aset pertahanan negara iaitu:-

a)Lim Kit Siang-Fast Strike Craft untuk Tentera Laut Diraja Malaysia
b) P. Patto -Menerbitkan maklumat dalam sebuah akhbar ROCKET mengenai Fast Strike Craft -bertajuk
''Coruption in navy $116 million Navy Scandel-25 mei 1981.
c)Sabri Sharif(wartawan akhbar NST)-Kajian Struktur Kekuatan TUDM 1984 pada 24 jan 1986